GrantedDecided 14 December 2017Westmeath County Council

Bishopstown, Rosemount, Moate

Planning application 177191
DecisionConditional grant
Decided14 December 2017
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Westmeath County Council.
The development will consist of (a) The complete refurbishment and resuse of an existing derelict single storey traditional farm cottage structure including inter alia removal of an attached lean-to storage area and the construction of a single storey extension together with loft accommodation for sleeping and storage proposes, including also proprietary effluent treatment tank and polishing filter, (b) construction of a detached single storey conservatory/garden room incorporating existing stone walls of previous outbuildings (c) alterations to location of existing vehicular entrances unto adjacent public road along with provision of associated hedgerows and indigenous planting and other ancillary site works, (all proposed works similar in principle to an application previously granted on this site under planning ref 07/4478).

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Westmeath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Bishopstown, Rosemount, Moate?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €49 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →