GrantedDecided 20 April 2023Westmeath County Council

Heathstown, Coralstown, Co.Westmeath

Planning application 2327
DecisionConditional grant
Decided20 April 2023
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Westmeath County Council.
Development consisting of demolitions, renovations and extension to existing dwelling. Demolitions to include porch to front of dwelling and single storey extension to rear of dwelling. Also to demolish existing hay barn and shed to rear of dwelling. Renovation of existing dwelling and proposed two storey extension with single storey element to rear of existing dwelling. Permission is also sought for decommissioning existing septic tank and for the installation of a new wastewater disposal system, to upgrade existing agricultural entrance and all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Westmeath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Heathstown, Coralstown, Co.Westmeath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →