GrantedDecided 04 September 2023Westmeath County Council

Busy Kids, Cloghanboy, Athlone Co. Westmeath

Planning application 2360218
DecisionConditional grant
Decided04 September 2023
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Westmeath County Council.
RETENTION for alterations to development previously granted planning permission under Ref: 02/2 (Two storey crèche). Permission is sought for: (1) retention of 3 no. extensions - total floor area 44.4sq.m; (2) retention of internal layout changes. (3) retention of elevational changes, (4) retention of advertising sign, (5) retention of repositioning of the building within the site, (6) retention of site layout changes (including an additional site access), (7) retention of changes to site boundaries and, (8) all associated ancillary site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Westmeath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Busy Kids, Cloghanboy, Athlone Co. Westmeath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →