GrantedDecided 17 January 2024Westmeath County Council

Hopestown, Mullingar, Co Westmeath

Planning application 2360258
DecisionConditional grant
Decided17 January 2024
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Westmeath County Council.
Construction of a single storey extension consisting of 90Sqm off the east facing gable. Retention permission consists of the following (a) retention of a new west facing window and bigger south facing windows, (b) for retention of the front porch as per constructed on site, (c) for permission to retain the closing of previously used domestic site entrance together with retaining the construction of the new domestic site entrance and (d) for retention of the boundaries located east, west of north on the site together with all associated site works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Westmeath has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Hopestown, Mullingar, Co Westmeath?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →