GrantedDecided 20 October 2017Wexford County Council

TRACYSTOWN EAST & YOUNGSTOWN, AUGHWILLIAM

Planning application 20171188
Get site risk briefNearby records
DecisionGranted (conditional)
Decided20 October 2017
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

Setting
Unknown
Site area
Not recorded
Floor area
Not recorded
Units
Not recorded

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Wexford County Council.
PERMISSION AT THIS SITE OF CIRCA 32.15 HECTARES WHICH WILL CONSIST OF: A 10-YEAR

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-300189-17Submitted 16 November 2017 / decided 14 August 2018
Status not recordedGranted (Conditional)
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.
Application ref
20171188
Received
01 September 2017
Decided
20 October 2017
FI requested
No
Authority
Wexford County Council
Application type
Permission
Outcome
Granted (conditional)
Source status
Documents indexed. Reason extraction for Wexford has not started yet.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Wexford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near TRACYSTOWN EAST & YOUNGSTOWN, AUGHWILLIAM?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.
Get my site risk brief

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →