GrantedDecided 13 September 2018Wexford County Council

FERNS UPPER & NEWTOWN (ED KILBORA), FERNS & KILBORA

Planning application 20181029
Get site risk briefNearby records
DecisionGranted (conditional)
Decided13 September 2018
Application typePermission
Source documents1

Site

Setting
Unknown
Site area
1.5 ha
Floor area
Not recorded
Units
Not recorded

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Wexford County Council.
PERMISSION FOR THE ERECTION OF FLOOD LIGHTING TO AN EXISTING PLAYING PITCH, AT

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-302729-18Submitted 15 October 2018 / decided 03 April 2019
Status not recordedGranted (Conditional)
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.
Application ref
20181029
Received
30 July 2018
Decided
13 September 2018
FI requested
No
Authority
Wexford County Council
Application type
Permission
Outcome
Granted (conditional)
Source status
Documents indexed. Reason extraction for Wexford has not started yet.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

Documents are indexed. Reason extraction for Wexford has not started yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near FERNS UPPER & NEWTOWN (ED KILBORA), FERNS & KILBORA?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.
Get my site risk brief

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →