RefusedDecided 06 December 2018Wicklow County Council

Stephen Street, Dunlavin, Co. Wicklow

Planning application 181154
DecisionRefused
Decided06 December 2018
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Wicklow County Council.
Change of use at ground floor level from original townhouse to commercial use, currently operating as a takeaway including new access door within traditional shopfront and all associated works, retention is sought to retain the subdivision of first floor area for use as 2 no apartments. Full PERMISSION is sought to carry out alterations to accommodate same, all ancillary site works and services. RETENTION is sought to retain 2 no ground floor apartments to the rear of premises and full PERMISSION is sought to carry out alterations to accommodate same, all ancillary site works and services

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Stephen Street, Dunlavin, Co. Wicklow?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →