GrantedDecided 15 March 2019Wicklow County Council

No 8 The Poplars, Kindlestown Lower, Delgany

Planning application 18777
DecisionConditional grant
Decided15 March 2019
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents1

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Wicklow County Council.
Subdivision of existing house into 2 detached dwellings, one part two storey and one single storey, demolition of existing domestic garage and part demolition of existing house to provide a separation distance of 4.1 meters between the two proposed houses, extension of each section of the existing house to create two independent dwellings, each with its own independent site area, separate vehicular access to the public roadway (one existing entrance relocated and one proposed additional entrance), utilities connections and all associated ground and landscaping works

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near No 8 The Poplars, Kindlestown Lower, Delgany?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →