GrantedDecided 16 January 2020Wicklow County Council

Mongnacool Upper, Co. Wicklow

Planning application 191250
DecisionConditional grant
Decided16 January 2020
Application typeRETENTION
Source documents4

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons8conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Wicklow County Council.
Single storey 39.825 sqm living are extension to side of existing bungalow, RETENTION for 78.28 sqm large plus, plus 2 no 24.6 sqm and 4.05 sqm smaller sheds, attached to front of large shed (total 106.93 sqm). All sheds are used for domestic storage / workshop use only, the large shed also accommodates stabling comprising of 2 no pony stalls. PERMISSION to install a new raised percolation area, comprising of a coco pod to EN12566 standards, and 80 sqm attenuation layer in accordance with EPA 2009 Regulations at existing dwelling

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.

No indexed appeal history

No structured appeal case is tied to this application. This means no appeal is indexed, not that an appeal is impossible.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

No refusal reason on record

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

  • 1Permission refers to documents lodged on 22-1-2019 save as conditions require.Other
  • 2Dwelling and extension must be occupied as a single unit and not sold/let separately.Occupancy
  • 3Stable/garage for private domestic use only, no human habitation or commercial use.Occupancy
  • 4No foul effluent discharge to watercourses.Wastewater Drainage
  • 5Uncontaminated water collected separately to drains/soakpits, not to foul storage.Water Services
  • 6Animal waste management: grade shed floor so effluent absorbed by bedding, then removed/spread on land.Environment Ecology
  • 7Effluent system to EPA 2009 spec. Photo evidence and chartered engineer certificate required before occupation.Wastewater Drainage
  • 8Water supply tested for Drinking Water Regulations 2014 compliance within 6 months; results agreed with PA.Water Services

Planning a project near Mongnacool Upper, Co. Wicklow?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 12 pages of searchable text on file.
Chief Executives Order1 page indexed
WICKL OW COUNTY C OUNCIL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT A@ Director of Services Order No: g2l2)20 y! nl Reference Number: t9t1250 O es Name of Applicant Robert & Johanna Thornton os Address: c/o Mr. P Marshall Seabank rp Arklow Pu Co. Wicklow g Nature of Application: in RETENTION for single storey 39.g25 sqm living are...
Final Grant1 page indexed
cocrt>ninle Coocae g>tl]' Cn)>aocAin Aras An Chontae / County Buildings (llicKlorcl CoupCU Cocrnstl Crll Mhant5rn / Wicklow Guthiin / Tel: (0404) 20148 Faics / Fax: (0404) 69452 Rphost / Emall: plandev@wicklowcoco. Forbaift PleanSla agus Comhshaol Suiomh / Webslte: ww.wrcklow.ie Planning Development and Environment...
Planners Report10 pages indexed
PLANNERS REPORT- HO'C PRR: l9l1250 WICKLOW COUNTY COUNCIL PLANNING DEPARTMENT y! PLANNING REPORT nl TO: FERGAL KEOGH S.E. / EDEL BERMINGHAM S.E.P O FROM: HOLLY O'CONNOR A.P SUBJECT REF: 79/12sO es NAME: ROBERT & JOHANNA THORNTON DEVELOPMENT: os SINGLE STOREY EXTENSION TO SIDE OF EXISTING BUNGALOW, RETENTION FOR LARGE...
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 3 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →