RefusedDecided 24 January 2023Wicklow County Council

Eir Exchange, River Lane, Arklow

Planning application 221229
DecisionRefused
Decided24 January 2023
Application typePERMISSION
Source documents3

Site

What is on file

0refusal reasons0conditions8nearby records

Proposed development

Application description published by Wicklow County Council.
To erect a 24m lattice telecommunications structure together with antennas, dishes and associated telecommunications equipment all enclosed by security fencing and remove an existing 12m lattice tower

Application and appeal history

Structured appeal stages, outcomes and source documents currently tied to this application.
ABP-315860-23Submitted 20 February 2023 / decided 09 April 2024
Status not recordedREFUSED
No appeal document has been bound to this case yet; the timeline will enrich as indexing continues.

Decision details

Core application dates and identifiers from the public planning record.

Planning analysis

Refusal reasons and planning conditions extracted from the public decision file.

Refusal reasons

Refusal reasons not machine-readable

No refusal reason is on record for this application yet.

Conditions

No conditions

No conditions are on record for this application yet.

Planning a project near Eir Exchange, River Lane, Arklow?

Get a site risk brief with the local decision pattern and up to 80 detailed nearby comparables (40 refusals and 40 grants), including extracted reasons and source links. €29 incl. VAT, PDF by email.

Inside the decision file

Extracts from the council's own decision documents for this application — 17 pages of searchable text on file.
Chief Executives Order1 page indexed
PLANMNG & DEVELOPMENT ACTS 2000 (as amended) Director of Services Order No: g4/2023 ! Reference Number: 22n229 y nl O Name of Applicant: Eircom Limited (t/a eir) Address: c/o Towercom es Unit 2, HQ 27 Mxket Street os Listowel rp Co. Kerry Pu Nature of Application: PERMISSION for to erect a 24m lattice...
Planners Report16 pages indexed
!y nl O es os rp Pu n io ct pe ns -I il ,(.*.(;fl,' *L-* L J0*."Jfl *I CI.-d'? lh*.l ryng-[{: {(. nc $a^u:ui.r.l\/\, e'e^J ou .^eJ". r-."@ h*^9..'4*J.*['d,,W *4...fa '--H*'k"* "-Ho'k"; tt,d,k ,h*lJ*, fl*^J"q &'{.- tt,dil ^*J .,., tt J*t u ,JLS*J-.*-, C &JL ^AE *W^te*e G-,u r*, ;{tW;, "q;".-:P"t rd -# 4-.J^[t..,an...
Read the full decision filePro members can search and read every indexed page of this file with the AI research assistant — planner's reasoning, conditions, and precedent across 2 documents.

Source documents

Original council portal records and source PDFs where available.

Nearby precedent

Similar nearby applications linked to this planning decision.
Get up to 80 detailed nearby comparables in a site risk brief →