Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Mount Juliet Estate , Thomastown , Co. Kilkenny
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 398 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 33 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 17660
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Kilkenny County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Kilkenny County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Kilkenny County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage33 structured nearby appeal records.
33 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredNo current-dated citation is loaded for Kilkenny County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
398Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
33Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
17660
For development at Mount Juliet Estate, Thomastown, Co. Kilkenny. The application site comprises an area of c. 0.46 hectares and relates to development adjacent to the Rose Garden Lodges. A number of Protected Structures exist at Mount Juliet Estate (including Refs. C367; D24, C1021, C1022, C1023). However, no works are proposed to these structures. Permission is sought for: the construction of 12 No. residential dwellings in 3 No. blocks (c. 1,638.9 sqm Gross Floor Ares), provision of car parking, vehicular access road and pedestrian pathways. All associated site development, landscaping and boundary treatment works above and below ground.
19137
Retention Permission for the removal of the putting green course at Mount Juliet Estate. The application site comprises an area of c. 0.8 hectares and relates to development to the north of the Rose Garden Lodges and east of the Walled Garden Lodges. A number of Protected Structures exist at Mount Juliet Estate (including Refs. C367; D24, C1021, C1022, C.1023). However, no works are proposed to these structures
18157
For development of a playground at Mount Juliet Estate. The application site comprises an area of c. 0.05 hectares and relates to development to the west of the Rose Garden Lodges. A number of Protected Structures exist at Mount Juliet Estate (including Refs: C367, D24, C1021, C1022, C1023). However no works are proposed to these structures at
2360349
For a new water tank (replacing an existing on the old generator building site), single storey control building, fencing, landscaping plus gravel surface access on an adjoining site at Mount Juliet, Thomastown, Co. Kilkenny. A number of Protected Structures exist at Mount Juliet Estate (inc. Refs C367, D24, C1021, C1022, C1023), however, no works are proposed to these structures
21823
For the reconfiguration and extension of the existing upper Hunters Yard car park, to provide for an additional 46 no. car parking spaces, demolition of existing drop-in childcare facility, associated hard and soft landscaping and all associated site works. A number of Protected Structures exist at Mount Juliet Estate (inc. Refs C367, D24, C1021, C1022, C1023), however, no works are proposed to these structures. A Natura Impact Statement (NIS) will be submitted to the Planning authority with the application
18746
For the relocation of existing bin store and provision of 2 no. car parking spaces. The application site comprises an area of c.0.004 hectares and relates to development adjacent to the Walled Garden Lodges. A number of Protected Structures exist at Mount Juliet Estate (including Refs. C367; D24; C1021; C1022; C1023). However, no works are proposed to these structures.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 398 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 17660The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief