Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 411 decisions within 5 km, 4 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 33 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Roscommon County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Roscommon County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
3 of 4 layers are loaded for Roscommon County Council and were intersected with the site; flood is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
3 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
33 structured nearby appeal records.
33 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Roscommon County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
For (i) change of use from offices to 8 no. apartments (1089 Sqm) to ground, first and second floor levels. (ii) elevational changes including balconies to internal court facades at first and second floor. (iii) Retention for 5 no. apartments (435 sqm) at second floor level with elevational changes from those granted under 04/2501, and all associated site works at
Planning permission for: (1) Change of use of existing ground floor unit No.2 from Retail to Medical use, (2) New associated signage and (3) All associated site works and services at
Retention permission to retain advertisement signage at
Permission and Retention Permission for (A) erection of Storage Unit to rear of existing retail premises; (B) retention of Small Office Unit to rear of existing retail premises at
To change the use of existing second floor from previously approved residential use to medical and associated office use. Permission is also sought to retain the use of part of the same floor that was previously converted for medical use at
For (a) the change of use of existing commercial premises to retail and office/storage, (b) internal renovations & elevational changes (c) building signage on front elevation, (d)along with connections to all site services and all other associated site works at
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 411 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 19519The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief