Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
NO. 1 LANDSDOWNE VILLAGE , KENMARE , CO KERRY
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
7% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 336 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 23 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 1977
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage23 structured nearby appeal records.
23 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
336Nearby applications
2Site-linked candidates
7%Nearby refused
23Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
1977
(A) RETAIN ELEVATIONAL CHANGES MADE TO THE EXTENSION TO THE DWELLING HOUSE GRANTED PLANNING PERMISSION UNDER PLANNING REF. NO. 05/1494, (B) PERMISSSION TO CHANGETHE USE OF THE EXTENSION TO THE DWELLING HOUSE GRANTED PLANNING PERMISSION UNDER PLANNING REF. NO. 05/1494 TO A SEPARATE/INDEPENDENT DWELLING HOUSE, (C) PERMISSION TO INSTALL A FRONT ENTRANCE DOOR, WINDOW AND OVERHEAD CANOPY AT THE FRONT OF THE PROPOSED SEPARATE/INDEPENDENT DWELLING HOUSE AND (D) RETENTION PERMISSION TO RETAIN THE EXISTING DWELLING HOUSE AND THE PROPOSED DWELLING HOUSE AND ALL ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS WITHIN REVISED SITE BOUNDARIES
2660328
Retention Permission to Retain Extension to Rear of House
2460278
(A) EXTEND THE EXISTING DWELLING HOUSE TO INCLUDE A LARGER GROUND FLOOR AREA AND A FIRST FLOOR LEVEL OVER PART OF THE GROUND FLOOR, (B) MAKE ALTERATIONS TO THE EXISTING DWELLING HOUSE TO INCLUDE ALTERATIONS TO THE INTERIOR LAYOUT, WINDOWS, DOORS, ROOF, ETC. AND ALL OTHER ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS
2515
CHANGE OF USE OF 6 NO. HOUSES FROM HOLIDAY HOMES ANCILLARY TO SHEEN FALLS COUNTRY CLUB TO PRIVATE DWELLING HOUSES
21894
(A) RETAIN AS CONSTRUCTED TWO EXTENSIONS AND VARIOUS ELEVATIONAL CHANGES MADE TO THE DWELLING HOUSE, (B) PERMISSION TO RETAIN AS CONSTRUCED A GARDEN SHED, AND (C) PERMISSION TO RETAIN AS CONSTRUCTED THE SITE ENTRANCE
22431
INCLUDE MODIFICATIONS AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF EXTENSION TO OUR DWELLING
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 336 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 1977The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief