Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage7 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
7 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Garrymaddock , Vicarstown , Co. Laois
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
4% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 257 decisions within 5 km, 7 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 9 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 22436
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage9 structured nearby appeal records.
9 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
257Nearby applications
7Site-linked candidates
4%Nearby refused
9Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
22436
Develop as follows: Retention permission for revised position of dwelling house, garage/fuel shed, septic tank, percolation area, front entrance and part of North_East boundary wall as granted permission under planning application Ref. No. 06/2110. Retention permission also for dividing wall at rear of house, access laneway and entrance gates to rear of site. Planning permission is being sought to reduce the size of site from 0.45 Ha to 0.24 Ha.
20675
Retain dwelling house as constructed
2546
Construct a dwelling house, domestic garage, septic tank with percolation area, narrow bore well and entrance
2545
Construct a dwelling house, domestic garage, septic tank with percolation area, narrow bore well and entrance
24126
Change house design in relation to permission previously granted (ref no. 24/68)
2468
Construct dwelling house, domestic garage, septic tank with percolation area, narrow bore well and entrance
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 257 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 22436The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief