Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage28 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
28 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
8% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 468 decisions within 5 km, 28 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 0 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
28 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
28 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Cork County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matched2 current citations from the Cork County Council development plan, each with section, page and source URL.
2 matched3 of 4 layers are loaded for Cork County Council and were intersected with the site; flood is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
3 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
No structured appeal row is currently tied to the matched decision set.
Citations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Cork County Council development plan.
2 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Permission for retention of the existing Gold Rush gaming arcade previously permitted by Cork County Council planning references 06/55089 [ABP ref: PL 70.222449] and 13/55005
Permission for change of use of the existing ground floor unit 1, from the original permitted retail use to an apartment, including alterations to the front elevation.
Alteration to rear elevation and extensions to same, alterations and extensions to 2 existing apartments at 1st & 2nd floor, No.5 Spa Square. Provision of 4 new apartments, 1 at first floor at No.3 and 1 at first floor and second floors of No. 4 Spa Square, 1 at 3rd floor No. 4 & 5 Spa Square, relocation of extract ducts from commercial units at ground floor along with associated site works.
Permission for retention for a two-storey extension to rear of existing dwelling, partial stone finish to front façade and all associated site works
Permission for the re-construction and alterations of an existing mid terraced derelict building; with the works comprising of a ground floor retail unit and 2 no residential units ( 1 no. 1 bedroom apartment to the rear ground floor along with 1 no. 3 bedroom duplex apartment set out over the 1st and 2nd floors), Partial demolition of rear side section to allow for new 1st floor rear balcony and provision of bin store along with associated site works
Change of use from retail to sit down restaurant and retention of alterations to front and rear elevations
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 468 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 24/6380The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief