Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage5 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
5 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Hartwell Upper , Kill , Co. Kildare.
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
18% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 895 decisions within 5 km, 5 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 83 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 201266
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage83 structured nearby appeal records.
83 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
895Nearby applications
5Site-linked candidates
18%Nearby refused
83Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
201266
To amend a permitted development Reg. Ref. 06/631 (which permitted the change of use of an existing dwelling to a creche). The proposed amendments seek to revise condition 8 of Reg. Ref. 06/631, which stipulated the maximum number of children in any one day shall not exceed 29 children, to stipulate a maximum number of children in any one day not to exceed 48 children
2460960
For 1. Retention for demolition of 45sq/m ground floor rear extension. 2. Permission for construction of a 98sq/m ground floor extension to the rear of existing dwelling and all associated siteworks. 3. Permission for construction of a new front boundary wall and automatic gate at the existing site entrance
211044
Of the existing dwelling along with retention permission of the existing site entrance and all existing site boundaries including all associated site development works and services
24204
For a three storey, 4 bedroom, detached house with single storey rear annex; rooflights at front and a dormer at rear, to the side of the existing dwelling, with provisions for two off-street car parking spaces; new internal sub-dividing party boundary wall; new SuDS drainage and all ancillary works
20361
Two storey extension to side incorporating new Family Flat, and single storey porch extension to front
2312
Two storey extension to side incorporating new Family Flat, and single storey porch extension to front
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 895 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 201266The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief