Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
15% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 2,639 decisions within 5 km, 4 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 317 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Galway City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Galway City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
3 of 4 layers are loaded for Galway City Council and were intersected with the site; flood is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
3 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
317 structured nearby appeal records.
317 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Galway City Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Permission is sought to retain and complete revised house plans, revised domestic garage and all associated services to that previously granted under Planning reference Numbers 11/151 and 15/300
Permission for development which consists of retaining the section of stone cladding facing Millers Lane on the rear boundary wall ( to regularise condition no.3 of planning register reference no 16/263 )
Permission for development which consists of: the retention of windows installed on the side elevations of the existing dwelling, which was originally granted under planning ref. no. 96/159, together with all associated site development works.
Permission for (1) Retention of alterations to existing roof lights in attic storage area and (2) Permission for new alterations to windows at attic storage level including blocking up gable window
Planning permission is sought for a two storey extension to the front and side of the existing dwelling including amendments to site services
Permission for development which consists of: permission is sought to erect dwelling house, garden shed/store and all associated services. Gross Floor Area of Proposed Works: 236.30sqm (dwelling house) and 35.50sqm (garden shed/store)
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 2,639 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 19237The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief