Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage1 register record is within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
1 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Temple Tots , Ardogelly , Templeboy
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
5% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 86 decisions within 5 km, 1 exact-site or onsite candidate record, and 2 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 21493
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage2 structured nearby appeal records.
2 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
86Nearby applications
1Site-linked candidates
5%Nearby refused
2Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
21493
Development consisting of amending the terms of current planning permission reference PL11/219 by removing condition no.2 - so that the business hours or numbers of children allowed to attend the creche are not limited by condition or planning permission
18272
For development consisting of amendments to previous planning permission granted under PL 16/480. The principal amendment is a redesign of the proposed extension together with all associated works and site works. Fort Laurel House is a Protected Structure Ref No. 25 on the record of Protected Structures of the Sligo County Development Plan 2017-2023.
2234
Development consisting of (1) demolition of existing dungstead (2) construction of a roofed manure pit, loose area and slatted shed with underground slurry storage tank along with all associated site works
18385
Development consisting of (1) demolition of existing cattle sheds (2) Backfilling existing dungstead (3) extending existing silage slab and walls (4) construction of new slatted shed together with all ancillary site works and services at the above address.
2460383
Proposed new dwelling house and septic tank with all ancillary site works
2360116
The development will consist of the construction of a cattle underpass beneath the public road L2204 together with ancillary site development works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 86 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 21493The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief