Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage37 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
37 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,765 decisions within 5 km, 37 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2601 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
37 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
37 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
2601 structured nearby appeal records.
2,601 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Permission is sought for amendments to previously approved Planning Application Reg. Ref. 3716/23 consisting of: reduction of the first floor extension depth to 3.5m from the existing house rear elevation; omission of first floor doors & Juliet balcony and replacement with window; increase of approved ridge height to facilitate construction detailing; amendments to position/type/layout of front facing rooflights; and the replacement of the rear garden shed with a new storage structure.
Permission to (a) demolish single storey extension and construct a two storey extension with flat roof over, all to the rear, (b) to increase existing ridge height to facilitate first floor accommodation, (c) install 3 no. velux-type rooflights to the front roof elevation.
Planning permission to carry out the following works: (a) construction of first floor dormer extension to the rear with attic conversion and associated modification to the existing front roof and ridge level, (b) installing 3 no. velux-type rooflights in the front roof, in both existing and extended parts.
Conversion of attic to bedroom/storage area with an increased ridge height of 400mm to 5300mm, dormer extension to the rear and associated site works
Attic conversion with new first floor extension to rear and incorporating raising of ridge line and 3 No. rooflights to front
The development will consist of a part single-storey, part two-storey rear extension with flat roof detail, an extended roof profile at ridge height with dormer-style extension across the rear roof facade. Internal modifications and all associated site works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,765 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record WEB1964/24The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief