Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
22% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 454 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 30 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Louth County Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Louth County Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Louth County Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
30 structured nearby appeal records.
30 matchedNo current-dated citation is loaded for Louth County Council. Historic references extracted from decisions are never presented as current policy.
Open preview
Open preview
Retention permission for elevational changes to existing dwelling and garage, previously granted planning permission under Planning applications 05/1567 and 16/92 and all associated site development works.
Permission for proposed extensions and modifications to existing dwelling house, including all associated and ancillary site development works
Permission to construct a single storey double domestic garage and upgrade existing balcony area, both to the front elevation. Also permission to construct a new vehicular entrance to the site and all associated site development works and services. SPLIT DECISION: 1. To GRANT Permission for construction of a new vehicular entrance and closing of existing vehicular entrance. To REFUSE Permission for the construction of a single storey domestic garage and upgrade of existing balcony area.
Retention permission for variations to the development as granted under planning permission ref. No 04934 including location of the site entrance, the carport and a balcony above, elevational changes to the dwelling house, and associated site works
Retention permission and permission for completion of development comprising extension to existing garage/shed
Permission for the construction of a single-storey extension to the side of an existing dwelling, the demolition of an existing garage to facilitate same, and all associated site development works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 454 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2560352The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief