Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage17 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
17 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
No.39 Flowerhill Rushbrooke Manor Ringmeen, Cobh Co. Cork
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 874 decisions within 5 km, 17 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 0 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 18/5014
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Register indexedNo structured appeal row is currently tied to the matched decision set.
Current policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
874Nearby applications
17Site-linked candidates
9%Nearby refused
0Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
18/5014
Construct a single storey extension, comprising of a porch & bay window extension to front (south) elevation of existing dwelling house.
23/6246
Modifications to existing dwelling house, namely; 1) Construction of a single storey extension to the side (east) elevation which includes a single storey porch extension wrapping around the front (south) Elevation, 2) Construction of a single storey extension to the rear (north) elevation, 3) New location for the vehicular entrance 4) Insert velux rooflight on front roof of existing dwelling house and 5) All associated site works.
21/6964
Construction of a two-storey extension at the side of our existing dwellinghouse and all associated site works. The extension design includes for a single storey annex at the rear and it also incorporates a single storey porch extension to the front of existing dwelling. The intended use of the ground floor of the proposed extension is as a ‘Granny Flat’ and the intended first floor use is to serve as additional habitable space to the existing dwelling.
22/5257
Two-storey extension to side and single storey porch to front of existing semi-detached two-storey dwelling as well as all associated site development works
22/6062
1) Retention permission of; a) the existing single storey sunroom extension located at the rear (south) elevation and b) the existing single storey extension located at the side (west) elevation of our dwelling house; 2) Permission for construction of a two-storey extension to the side (west) elevation of our existing dwelling house and all associated site works. *Note - part of the existing single storey side extension (which is being retained) will be incorporated into the proposed two-storey side extension design.
24/5704
Permission to increase height of existing monopole telecommunications structure granted planning permission under planning Ref: 21/6706 by 3m, from 18m to 21m, and add antennas, dish and associated ground based equipment and fencing.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 874 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 18/5014The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief