Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage38 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
38 matchedSite planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
14% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 281 decisions within 5 km, 38 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1 structured appeal.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
38 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
38 matchedCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Current section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Each layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
1 structured nearby appeal record.
1 matchedHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
Open preview
Open preview
A) Amalgamation of units 15 and 16, and b) change of use of units 15 and 16 from retail units to gymnasium and all associated site works.
(a) Change of use of Unit 21 and associated balcony from restaurant to retail, (b) demolition of dividing wall between unit 17 & unit 21, (c) amalgamation of unit 17 & unit 21 into a single retail unit and all associated site works
(A) New external façade wall-mounted signage at various locations. (B) Associated strip lighting for signage and all associated site works.
The change of use of an existing vacant unit from crèche to office.
(a) amalgamation of unit 2 and unit 3, (b) change of use of unit 2 from retail to take away facility and change of use of unit 3 from retail to restaurant, (c) part demolition of the existing party wall between unit 2 and 3, (d) revised shop front entrance elevation for unit 2 and unit 3, and all associated site works
Permission for; a) amalgamation of unit 2 & unit 3, b) demolition of dividing wall between unit 2 & 3, c) change of use from retail to restaurant, converting to a single unit used as a restaurant, d) revised shop entrance/ elevation and all associated site works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 281 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 18/5541The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief