Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Maul and Curraheen Rosscarbery Co. Cork
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
6% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 294 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 0 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 19/797
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Register indexedNo structured appeal row is currently tied to the matched decision set.
Current policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
294Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
6%Nearby refused
0Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
19/797
Construction of Summer Tubing Park (outdoor activity area), consisting of 3 number runs/lanes, tubing ramp, air bag, walkways and all associated site works
20/334
Permission for revised site boundaries to dwelling permitted under PL. Reg No. 11/527
19/478
Construction of single storey dwellinghouse, provision of wastewater treatment system and all associated site works
25/22
Permission for revised design of house no. 16 permitted under Pl Reg No: 22/778
23/573
Permission for revised design of house no. 9 permitted under Pl. Reg No: 22/150 and permission also sought to revise roof design of house No.'s 11 & 12 permitted under Pl. Reg. No: 22/150
22/778
Permission for extension of the housing development permitted under Pl. Reg. No's 18/488 and 22/00150 consisting of the construction of 6 semi detached dwellings and 1 detached dwelling and all associated site development works
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 294 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 19/797The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief