Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
PORTLOUGH UPPER , NEWTOWNCUNNINGHAM , LIFFORD PO
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
8% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 223 decisions within 5 km, 4 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 5 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 1950204
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage5 structured nearby appeal records.
5 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
223Nearby applications
4Site-linked candidates
8%Nearby refused
5Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
1950204
(A) A REPLACEMENT FRONT BOUNDARY FENCE CONSISTING OF RENDERED AND CAPPED CONCRETE BLOCK PIERS AND TIMBER CLOSE-BOARDING AND (B) A REPLACEMENT BELL-MOUTH ENTRANCE CONSISTING OF CAPPED CONCRETE BLOCK PIERS AND RENDER BLOCK WING WALLS
2250707
RELOCATION OF THE ENTRANCE FROM THAT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED UNDER PLANNING REFERENCE 18/51731
1851731
CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING HOUSE WITH DETACHED DOMESTIC GARAGE AND SEPTIC TANK WITH PERCOLATION AREA
2460741
DEMOLITION OF EXISTING MICA DEFECTIVE DWELLING HOUSE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW REPLACEMENT DWELLING HOUSE WITH CONNECTION TO EXISTING SERVICES AND ALL ASSOCIATED SITE WORKS
1950143
ERECTION OF A DWELLING HOUSE AND SEPTIC TANK
1851536
CONSTRUCTION OF A DWELLING HOUSE WITH DETACHED DOMESTIC GARAGE AND SEPTIC TANK WITH PERCOLATION AREA
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 223 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 1950204The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief