Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage15 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
15 matchedFree preview / €29 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
€29 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
21-23 LOWER MAIN STREET , LETTERKENNY , LETTERKENNY PO
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
7% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 1,137 decisions within 5 km, 15 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 63 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2050108
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage. “Not yet covered” means no conclusion is drawn while source datasets or policy extraction are still being loaded.
Zoning and settlement
Not yet coveredCurrent indexed zoning and settlement layers are intersected with the selected site where coverage exists.
Rural-housing policy
Not yet coveredCurrent section-and-page citations have not yet been loaded for this authority.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Not yet coveredEach layer reports its own coverage; missing coverage never appears as a clean result.
Access, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage63 structured nearby appeal records.
63 matchedCurrent policy citations
Not yet coveredHistoric extracted references are not presented as current policy; verified citations are still being loaded.
1,137Nearby applications
15Site-linked candidates
7%Nearby refused
63Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
No reasons on record yet
More refusal reasons are being processed from public planning records.
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2050108
DIGITAL ADVERTISING SIGN AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORT STRUCTURE
2562279
CHANGE OF USE OF OFFICE ACCOMMODATION (PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED UNDER PLANNING REF. NO. L.79/04) TO A 2 BEDROOM RESIDENTIAL UNIT ACCESSED VIA EXISTING ALLEYWAY
2050860
CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING BOOKMAKERS OFFICE (89 SQ.M) TO AMUSEMENT ARCADE ALONG WITH ASSOCIATED EXTERNAL FASCIA SIGNAGE
2660502
VARIATION OF CONDITION NO. 8 OF PLANNING REF. NO. 24/61848 TO EXTEND PERMITTED OPENING HOURS
2461848
(1) CHANGE OF USE OF GROUND FLOOR RETAIL UNIT TO TAKE-AWAY AND (2) ASSOCIATED SIGNAGE WITH TAKE-AWAY AND ALL ASSOCIATED WORKS
2461660
CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING OFFICE UNIT TO STUDENT ACCOMMODATION AT SECOND FLOOR LEVEL AND ASSOCIATED WORKS
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 1,137 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €29 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2050108The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief