Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage42 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
42 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
12, Bessborough Parade, Rathmines, Dublin 6
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 14,284 decisions within 5 km, 42 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3045 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2143/19
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3045 structured nearby appeal records.
3,045 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched14,284Nearby applications
42Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
3,045Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity7
Visual Amenity4
Procedure Invalid3
Design2
Other2
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2143/19
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of the following works: removal of c.1950's single storey extension to rear (kitchen & external shed 5 sq.m); erection of a new 19 sq.m single storey extension to rear and new opening at ground floor of rear return; landscaping works to rear garden and widening of existing ope in rear boundary wall. Renovation works to main house including: replacement of aluminium windows at front with timber sash windows and restoration of sash windows to rear; attic conversion in main house and new attic stair; relocation of door to master bedroom; alterations to first floor layout in rear return; new window opening to gable of rear return; 1 no. rooflight to rear return; 2 no. rooflights to rear of main house and all associated site works.
3104/22
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of the following works to protected structure no. 754: attic conversion and new attic stair, alteration to door of master bedroom and first floor landing area and addition of 3 no. rooflights to rear roof slope of main house.
2449/21
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of: 1. Construction of a 2-3 storey, 3-bedroom mews dwelling with ground level garden and courtyard and terrace at 2nd floor level; 2. Landscaping, boundary treatments and associated site works and services.
3653/22
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: 38 Mountpleasant Avenue Lower is a Protected Structure. The development will consist of:- 1) Construction of a 2 storey, 2-bedroom flat-roof mews dwelling with ground level garden and courtyard; 2) Landscaping, boundary, treatments and associated site works and services.
3911/24
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Permission for change of use of existing (single storey) light industrial building to a one bedroomed dwelling, and retention permission for previous minor layout and elevational changes including provision of open landscaped courtyard within original footprint.
3955/20
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Planning permission for development will consist of: removal of existing walls/fence at rear of site addressing Fortescue Lane, construction of a two-storey stand alone ancillary building of circa 62 sq.m. located in the rear garden with access off Fortescue Lane,all associated ancillary and landcape works necesary to facilitate the development.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 14,284 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2143/19The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief