Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage14 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
14 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
32 Park Avenue, Dublin 4
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 12,091 decisions within 5 km, 14 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2848 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2510/21
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage2848 structured nearby appeal records.
2,848 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched12,091Nearby applications
14Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
2,848Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity10
Visual Amenity9
Design6
Traffic Sightlines6
Other4
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2510/21
Permission for the provision of a new vehicular entrance with new gates and parking provision for one vehicle in front garden, with associated landscaping.
3078/21
An application for permission for the widening of the existing vehicular entrance.
4010/20
The development consists of the construction of 2 no. 2-bed apartments (one per floor) of appx 84 sqm each within the envelope of the original main house which is currently vacant and partially demolished, the retention of the front facade only, the demolition of the existing return, the lowering of the lower ground floor level and its extending to the front facade, creation of a lowered terrace 'area' to the front and the construction of a 4 bedroom part single storey, part 2 storey house (appx 128 sqm) to the rear of the garden, accessed via the existing side passage. Park Avenue is a residential conservation area.
WEB5174/25
We, Jackie and Eddie Moloney, intend to apply for planning permission for development at No.40 Park Avenue, Dublin 4. The house is on the Dublin City Council Derelict Site Register (No. DS1263). The development will consist of taking down and rebuilding the front façade (south) and Side (west) gable wall to match original design and the adjoining neighbour. The works are being carried out to make the building structurally safe and to address compromised and defective bricks.
3197/25
The development will consist of the restoration and repair of the existing front facade, including reinstating front chimney and original floor levels and the installation of a new timber sash windows and front door to original openings. It will consist of a full internal refurbishment of the existing house and new double pitch slate roof to the front. It will also consist of the construction of a new two storey extension with a flat roof with rooflights to the rear of the house, inclusive of all ancillary works.
WEB1025/23
The development consists of: demolition of single-story extensions to rear (32.4 Sq.m) and garage to side (20.8 Sq.m), construction of a single storey extension to side and rear (90.3 Sq.m); provision of a new window to existing gable (North West) elevation; new window and alterations to existing window ope on rear return side (Northwest) elevation; provision of rooflights; widening of existing vehicular entrance to 3.5m, and associated works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 12,091 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2510/21The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief