Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage5 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
5 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
3, Woodlawn Court, Santry, Dublin 17
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 6,198 decisions within 5 km, 5 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 669 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2835/21
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage669 structured nearby appeal records.
669 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched6,198Nearby applications
5Site-linked candidates
9%Nearby refused
669Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Zoning Contravention11
Residential Amenity10
Traffic Sightlines10
Other8
Visual Amenity8
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2835/21
The proposed development will consist of changes to existing hipped roof profile, including proposed full gable to side and extended ridge to incorporate extension of attic space for playroom/storage.
WEB1450/26
Changing the main roof from a hipped roof to a gable-ended roof, with a new end gable wall and extended ridge and a new dormer rooflight along the rear of the new roof and a new velux rooflight on the front pitch of the roof, all to an existing two storey semi-detached dwelling.
3311/24
For Hip build up into dutch hip at attic level, attic conversion with dormer roof window on rear slope of roof at attic level.
WEB1429/20
Conversion of attic space to a study with a dormer window to rear roof plane and existing hipped roof profile to be converted to a gable end roof with a window in the new gable wall.
WEB1259/26
The development will consist of the amending the existing roof to a gable roof with gable window at attic level and the construction of one dormer window in the main roof to the rear.
3827/19
RETENTION: Retention permission is sought for the following changes to previously granted Permission (3526/17), bay window and canopy to original house omitted, A-roof with glazing formed at entrance, porthole window omitted, 2 gable windows and a single door only to gable, extension kept to line of rear of existing house.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 6,198 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2835/21The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief