Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage22 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
22 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
68, Mount Tallant Avenue, Terenure, Dublin 6W
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,325 decisions within 5 km, 22 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3144 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 2952/20
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3144 structured nearby appeal records.
3,144 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,325Nearby applications
22Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
3,144Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity8
Traffic Sightlines4
Visual Amenity4
Design2
Other2
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
2952/20
The development will consist of a vehicular access at the front of the property encompassing the part removal of the front boundary wall to allow for the creation of an off road tarmac parking space in the area occupied by the front garden together with localised dishing of existing pavement to enable access and all associated site works.
3141/20
Planning permission consisting of the introduction of a vehicular access point at the front of the property involving partial removal of the front boundary wall, reconfiguration of external steps to allow for the creation of a gravel driveway with off street parking, the construction of a 1100mm high boundary wall to be shared with the neighbouring property at No. 75 Mount Tallant Avenue, dishing of the existing pavement in front of the property, and all associated site works.
WEB5469/25
The development seeking permission will consist of the provision of a 3m wide vehicular entrance to the front of the property
WEB1030/19
Permission is sought to raise the pitch on the rear extension roof, also to change from a hip to a gable roof to the rear and construct a flat roof with no windows to one side with roof windows on the pitched roof to the other side of the rear extended roof at attic level for a non-habitable storage room and associated internal works in this mid terrace two storey house.
WEB1424/21
Conversion of attic area to storage area with with new dormer type window to rear with internal modifications associated site works.
WEB1918/21
PERMISSION & RETENTION: Retention permission for the new bathroom window to the front. Creation of new vehicular access to the front garden for parking space. Removal of the front wall.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,325 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 2952/20The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief