Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage15 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
15 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 5,957 decisions within 5 km, 15 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 694 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
15 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
15 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
694 structured nearby appeal records.
694 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
PERMISSION for the demolition of the existing single storey extension at the rear, the construction of a new single storey extension at the rear, a new two storey extension at the side, alterations to the finishes of the existing front façade including a new recessed porch, the conversion of the existing attic space including changing of the roof profile from hip end to gable end, a dormer extension to the rear roof slope and velux roof lights to the front and rear roof slopes.
Planning Permission sought for proposed vehicular access at front of No. 67 Dollymount Avenue, Clontarf, Dublin 3 D03 HR64.
The development will consist of conversion of existing attic space for new bedroom comprising a new box dormer to the rear of existing dwelling, 2 No. Velux roof lights to the front elevation and a new 3.0m wide vehicular entrance including all associated site development works.
Planning permission for the construction of a single storey extension to the rear, a two storey extension to the side and associated ancillary site works.
I, Karen Kennedy, intend to apply to Dublin City Council for planning permission for: 1. Demolition of an existing rear conservatory at lower ground floor 2. The construction of a part single storey, part two storey new rear extension at lower ground and ground floor levels 3. New dormer window to the rear roof of the existing attic level. 4. Internal alterations at lower ground, ground floor and attic levels. The application includes for all associated external works at 4 The Mews, Dollymount Avenue, Dublin 3, D03 H9R3
The development consists of the demolition of existing extensions to the rear of existing house and for the construction of a single storey extension rear and to convert the existing attic space to a store/office area with provision for a dormer window to the side & rear and for all associated site works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 5,957 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3065/25The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief