Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage13 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
13 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
133 Meadowbank, Rathgar, Dublin 6
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,809 decisions within 5 km, 13 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3521 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3113/20
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3521 structured nearby appeal records.
3,521 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,809Nearby applications
13Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
3,521Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity9
Traffic Sightlines5
Visual Amenity5
Procedure Invalid4
Design3
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3113/20
Planning permission for residential development. The proposed development consists of: a. The demolition of an existing single storey lean-to extension; b. The construction of a new two storey extension to the side of existing dwelling; c. The removal of the existing roof and reconstruction with an increased ridge level; d. The construction of a new attic bedroom including installation of two roof lights and a bay window located on the eastern elevation; e. The re-cladding of a previously constructed rear extension (ref: 2806/10) to match the proposed new side extension; f. Minor alterations to existing structure; g. Hard & soft landscaping including new green roofs and all associated site works.
SD25B/0518W
Attic conversion for storage, featuring a full raised gable to the side, dormer windows to the front and rear, and two rooflights on the front elevation. A single-storey flat roof extension is proposed to the rear. To the front, a part two-storey, part single-storey extension is planned, incorporating a new front-facing gable over the two-storey element. Additionally, a small shed for bicycle storage will be installed at the front of the property
SD18B/0266
Construct a single storey rear extension.
SD20B/0513
Ground, first floor and attic extension to the side, front and rear including an attic conversion resulting in a overall increase in floor area from 107sq.m to 240sq.m and from a three bedroom dwelling to a four bedroom dwelling with all drainage and associated site works.
SD22B/0364
Attic conversion for storage with 2 dormer windows to the rear. Side first floor extension for 2 additional bedrooms with raised gable to side. 2 storey front extension with gable. Front bay window extension with pitched roof over. Widening of front vehicular access. Raised fencing and gate to front and side of front garden. Single storey extension to rear. 4 velux windows to the front roof area.
SD22B/0365
Single storey extension to front with 2 roof windows. 2 storey first floor extension to the side and front with gable to the front to give 2 additional bedrooms. Raised gable to the side. Widening of front vehicular access. Raised fencing and gate to front and side of front garden. 2 dormer windows to the rear and 1 dormer to the front roof area. 1 velux window to the front roof area. Conversion of garage to living area.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,809 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3113/20The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief