Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage18 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
18 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
108, Sandford Road, Ranelagh, Dublin 6
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 14,046 decisions within 5 km, 18 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3280 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3207/20
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3280 structured nearby appeal records.
3,280 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched14,046Nearby applications
18Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
3,280Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity9
Visual Amenity7
Traffic Sightlines6
Design5
Other4
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3207/20
Permission for (1) the construction of a first floor extension to the rear of the existing house (2) the addition of a first floor bedroom window on the existing south eastern elevation and (3) the addition of 3 no. Velux type windows on the existing roof line of the house along with all associated site works.
WEB5074/21
The development will consist of, the erection of a Games Room and Bike Shed in the rear garden, with sand cement rendered parapet walls 3.33m high with a flat roof behind and 1 no. 1.35m x1.35m openable roof light and all ancillary works.
WEB1006/20
The development will consist of the demolition of the garage to the side and the single storey extensions to the rear and the construction of a two storey extension to the rear and side including the widening of the front access gate to 3.6metres together with an automatic timber faced gate 1.2m high and all ancillary works
WEB1496/24
The proposed development comprises the demolition of the existing single storey garage/shed to the rear, the rear extensions, the mansard roof to the rear and chimney. Construct a new part single part two storey rear and side extension, with flat roof profile and rear roof lights. Construction of a standalone single storey gym/store to the rear of the garden, landscaping, widening of existing vehicular access incorporating a sliding gate, bin store, and all other associated works.
WEB1570/24
The demolition of the garage to the side and the single storey extension to the rear and the construction of a two storey extension to the rear and side including the widening of the existing vehicular access to 3.6metres together with an automatic timber faced gate 1.2M high and all ancillary works.
WEB1596/22
The development will consist of 1) the demolition of the existing single storey rear/side extension; 2) relocation of existing pedestrian access from Cherryfield Avenue; 3) the construction of a 2 storey side extension and single storey rear extension with relocated pedestrian entrance off Cherryfield Avenue; 4) demolition of existing Garage with existing vehicular access off Cherryfield Avenue 5) demolition of existing Sheds to rear of Garden; 6) construction of a New garage with a wider vehicular entrance; 7) construction of Shed and Gym to rear of Garden; 8) New pedestrian access off Cherryfield Avenue beside new garage and associated works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 14,046 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3207/20The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief