Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage27 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
27 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
9, The Crescent, Donnybrook, Dublin 4
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,564 decisions within 5 km, 27 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3157 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3336/21
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3157 structured nearby appeal records.
3,157 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,564Nearby applications
27Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
3,157Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity10
Visual Amenity8
Traffic Sightlines6
Design5
Other4
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3336/21
The development consists of: alterations and removal of existing front boundary railings, replacement of garden with permeable paving, the creation of vehicular access to front garden and provision for 1 no. off street car parking space, with all associated landscaping, boundary treatment and ancillary works necessary to facilitate development.
3337/21
The development consists of: alterations and removal of existing front boundary railings, replacement of garden with permeable paving, the creation of vehicular access to front garden and provision for 1 no. off street car parking space, with all associated landscaping, boundary treatment and ancillary works necessary to facilitate development.
3335/21
Planning permission for the development consists of alterations and removal of existing front boundary railings, replacement of garden with permeable paving, the creation of vehicular access to front garden and provision of 1no. off street car parking space with all associated landscaping, boundary treatment and ancillary works necessary to facilitate development.
WEB1856/23
Permission is sought for development at 17 The Crescent, Donnybrook, Dublin 4, D04 A6Y7. The development will consist of: (i) Construction of a new dormer window to the rear elevation at attic level (ii) and all associated site works.
WEB1287/23
Planning permission is sought for the proposed development will consist of (i) Construction of new oriel bay window to the front elevation (ii) Construction of a new single storey flat roof extension to the rear (iii) and all associated site works.
3016/23
Permission for the development comprising: alterations to development previously approved under Reg. Ref. 3513/20 comprising: (i) the change of use of an approved commercial unit (225sq.m.) at ground floor level from cafe to medical (and related consultants) use; (ii) provision of signage on the northern/eastern elevations of the building to serve the medical (and related consultants) unit; (iii) all associated ancillary works necessary to facilitate the proposed development.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,564 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3336/21The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief