Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage15 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
15 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
22 Copeland Grove, Clontarf, Dublin 3
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
11% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 10,696 decisions within 5 km, 15 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1299 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3547/24
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage1299 structured nearby appeal records.
1,299 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched10,696Nearby applications
15Site-linked candidates
11%Nearby refused
1,299Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity2
Other1
Visual Amenity1
Wastewater Percolation1
Zoning Contravention1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3547/24
The development will consist providing off-street parking in the front garden,creating a 2.6 metre entrance opening in the front wall, dishing the public foothpath at the front of the dwelling and associated site and storm drainage works.
WEB1139/22
PERMISSION & RETENTION: Permission and Retention permission sought for the following development: (A) Proposed one + two storey extension to rear and side incorporating conversion of part of existing garage to side (B) Proposed first floor window in lieu of existing landing window to south east side of dwelling (C) Retention & completion of widened vehicle entrance.
WEB1579/22
The development consists of the refurbishment and extension of an existing two storey semi-detached property including the removal of single storey extension to the side and rear, the construction of a new two storey extension to the side and the rear which includes a new kitchen, dining area, utility room, bedrooms and bathroom, along with a single storey garden studio space, a single storey front extension including bay window, porch and bathroom, landscaping to the front and rear and all associated site works.
WEB1073/20
The development will consist of the refurbishment and extension of existing two storey semi detached property including the removal of single storey extension to the side and rear, the construction of a new two storey extension to the side and the rear which includes a new kitchen, dining area, utility room, bedrooms and bathroom, along with a single storey garden studio space, a single storey front extension including bay window, porch and bathroom, landscaping to the front and rear and all associated site works.
WEB1666/19
The development will consist of the refurbishment and extension of existing two storey semi detached property including the removal of single storey extension to the side and rear, the construction of a new two storey extension to the side and the rear of the house which includes a new kitchen, dining area, utility room, bedrooms and bathroom, along with a single storey garden studio space, landscaping to the front and rear and all associated site works.
WEB1535/22
Planning Permission is sought by Rachel Hegarty + Chris van der Lee at 31 Copeland Grove, Clontarf, Dublin 3, D03 X8W2. The development will consist of the demolition of portions of the existing single storey rear extension, rear wall and front porch; the construction of a 1st floor rear and side extension over existing single storey extension; construction of a single storey front extension; and associated works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 10,696 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3547/24The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief