Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage2 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
2 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
37, Violet Hill Drive, Glasnevin, Dublin 11
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 8,759 decisions within 5 km, 2 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1025 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3554/19
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage1025 structured nearby appeal records.
1,025 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched8,759Nearby applications
2Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
1,025Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity8
Other6
Traffic Sightlines4
Procedure Invalid3
Visual Amenity3
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3554/19
RETENTION: The development consists of the retention of a garden boundary wall.
WEB1910/26
The development will consist of a new window in the gable wall, an attic conversion to a home office and storage, a roof light to the front and a rear roof dormer.
5350/22
The development will consist of the replacement of the existing scrolling internally illuminated double sided 'Metropole' advertising display case with a double sided digital advertising display case and associated works.
WEB5010/21
I, Audrey Baker and Alan Walsh, intend to apply for Permission for development at 17 Violet Hill Drive, Glasnevin, Dublin 11, D11 Y0ET consisting of the demolition of an existing shed to the rear and the construction of a single storey extension to the rear of the existing dwelling. The extension is intended for personal use only by current occupants and will consist of 1 bedroom, 1 bathroom, a kitchen/ living area and storage shed and to include 3no. roof lights. The extension will be accessed from the existing side laneway and the kitchen/ sitting room of the existing dwelling, works to also include for all associated site works.
2779/19
RETENTION & PERMISSION: Sought for alteration/extension of the existing two storey semi-detached house at 153 Old Finglas Road, Dublin 11, D11 K5A4, comprising construction of two storey extension to the front/side including extension of the pitched roof, single storey extension to the rear, conversion of the attic to include a dormer window to the rear and 2 no. rooflights to the front and retention of widened vehicular entrance and associated site development.
2577/21
Permission for single storey ground floor extension to the rear and all associated site works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 8,759 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3554/19The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief