Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage12 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
12 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
22, Martin Savage Park, Ashtown, Dublin 15
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 5,998 decisions within 5 km, 12 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 784 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3558/22
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage784 structured nearby appeal records.
784 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched5,998Nearby applications
12Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
784Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity34
Visual Amenity33
Traffic Sightlines25
Design16
Zoning Contravention15
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3558/22
RETENTION: Permission for retention of: A. Full smooth plaster finish to entire front facade, as opposed to half plaster/half brick finish as proposed under previous Planning Ref. No: 4610/07. B. All associated site works at No 22 Martin Savage Park, Ashtown, Dublin 15.
2171/21
Planning permission for retention of: a. single storey shed/workshop, b. all associated site works
WEB1069/24
Construction of a new, two storey, end of terrace house, with 3 bedrooms to side garden of existing dwelling (no.8), including retaining existing vehicular entrance and all associated site works; and for works to existing house (no.8) to include the provision of a new vehicular entrance and driveway to front garden, a new 16m2 single storey rear extension, internal alterations and all associated site works.
3179/21
Permission for development consisting of construction of a new, detached two storey, 3 bedroomed house to side garden of existing dwelling, including retaining existing vehicular entrance, raising of part of side boundary wall to 1.8m and all associated site works, and for works to existing house to include the provision of a new vehicular entrance and driveway to front garden; a new 16m2 single storey rear extension, internal alterations and all associated site works.
WEB1075/21
For development consisting of construction of a new, detached three storey, 4 bedroomed house to side garden of existing dwelling, including retaining existing vehicular entrance; raising of front boundary wall to 1.8m and all associated site works; and for works to existing house to include the provision of a new vehicular entrance and driveway to front garden, a new 16m2 single storey rear extension, internal alterations and all associated site works.
3899/20
The development will consist of: the removal of existing external planters and guarding and removal of the ‘Canal Bar’ signage on the south elevation; Construction of a single storey glazed extension with flat roof to the front of the existing two storey building, to allow for additional seating area for bar use; Permission is also sought for an extended designated smoking area adjacent to the new proposed extension, and installation of new signage on proposed new extension, all with associated site works.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 5,998 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3558/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief