Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage15 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
15 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
48, Philipsburgh Terrace, Marino, Dublin 3
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 11,370 decisions within 5 km, 15 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1399 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3609/22
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage1399 structured nearby appeal records.
1,399 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched11,370Nearby applications
15Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
1,399Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Other2
Residential Amenity2
Ecology1
Procedure Invalid1
Visual Amenity1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3609/22
Permission is sought for single storey porch extension to front of house, also bay window to front of house to increase lounge space and all associated site works.
WEB1475/19
The demolition of the existing single storey rear extension, portions of rear wall, the construction of a 2-storey rear extension, new window to side elevation, skylights to the rear and side, external wall insulation, south facing solar panels on the roof and associated works.
WEB1174/22
The development will consist of a single storey WC extension to side of existing house with monopitch tiled roof and velux window. Works will include a new door to existing shed from shared lane and associated site works.
WEB1386/21
Alterations to the front boundary of the house to facilitate vehicular access, dishing of the kerb and all associated site works
WEB5344/25
The development will consist of; a rear first floor extension (12.7sqm) and a rear attic level dormer, both flat roofed, with metal cladding; with altered position of rear first floor window and new skylight within rear roof; and all ancillary site works.
WEB1626/20
RETENTION: Retain vehicular access to front garden. Proposed dishing of footpath for front access driveway with associated site development works. Proposed pedestrian gateway to rear boundary wall.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 11,370 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3609/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief