Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage4 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
4 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
7, Rathvale Park, Ayrefield, Dublin 13, D13 P2K2
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 5,600 decisions within 5 km, 4 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 660 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3616/22
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage660 structured nearby appeal records.
660 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched5,600Nearby applications
4Site-linked candidates
9%Nearby refused
660Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity22
Visual Amenity20
Zoning Contravention18
Design14
Traffic Sightlines11
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3616/22
The development will consist of demolishing existing rear extension and replacing with a new ground floor extension only with a new apex roof connecting into the existing side extension. A proposed new ground floor only extension to the front of the existing house. A new ground floor only extension to the front of the existing garage/storage building to the rear of the property and all ancillary works.
WEB1105/26
Single-storey mono-pitch roof extension to the side and rear, with the main entrance door relocated from the side to the front of the proposed extension.
WEB1962/21
Planning Permission sought by Therese & Alan Darcy to construct a new side & rear extension (23.1sq m) to include a new living room & bathroom to the existing dwelling with associated site works all at No. 133 Tonlegee Road, Dublin 5, D05 FK26.
3197/21
Planning permission for the development will consist of a proposed new first floor extension to the rear of the existing house. A proposed new dormer roof to the rear of the existing house roof. 2no. proposed new velux windows to the front of the existing house roof and all ancillary works.
4381/24
To extend roof to the height of the raised gable end wall height of roof 7.665m same as existing height. New window in gable wall in storage area of attic and the existing landing window relocated. New dormer roof on rear elevation of roof height of roof 7.665 with windows on rear elevation of dormer.
WEB1919/22
Planning permission for a rear flat roof dormer at attic level to existing pitched roof at existing dwelling.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 5,600 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3616/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief