Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage13 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
13 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Block B, Castle Gate Apartments, Castle Street, Dublin 2.
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,058 decisions within 5 km, 13 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2037 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3633/21
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage2037 structured nearby appeal records.
2,037 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,058Nearby applications
13Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
2,037Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity3
Design1
Procedure Invalid1
Traffic Sightlines1
Visual Amenity1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3633/21
Permission for the removal of an existing mechanical vehicular gate to be replaced with a similar gate positioned closer to the street building line at Block B, Castle Gate Apartments, Castle Street, Dublin 2.
2357/21
Planning permission for replacement of existing shopfronts and install new shopfront streetscape incorporating 5 no. retail units and apartment block entrance (6 no. in total) and all associated site development works.
3589/20
Permission for internal re-configuration of the existing Healthcare Building along with the addition of 3.no single storey external ancillary rooms (27 m2) and 3 storey lift shaft to the rear (14m2), (total additional area 41m2) and all associated site works and services.
2131/20
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Planning permission for development on a 0.11 ha site approximately located at Nos. 16-18 Lord Edward Street (a protected structure) and No. 18 Exchange Street Upper (known as ''Fashion House'') and Copper Alley, Dublin 2. The proposed development comprises minor amendment to the Parliament Hotel (permitted under DCC Reg. Ref. 3448/16, as amended by DCC Reg. Refs. 4521/17, 3280/18, 2525/19) and includes additional plant screening to Parliament Roof to match material of permitted plant screen, 3no. street level painted metal out of hours security screens at Lord Edward Street entrances, 2no. canopies to Fashion House fifth floor terrace, relocation of 2no. existing flag poles to Parliament building at first floor level to corner of Lord Edward Street and Exchange Street Upper and 2no. timber louvered panels within external door on Copper Alley towards Cow's Lane painted to match door finish.
2304/20
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Development on a 0.11 ha site approximately. The proposed development comprises of a low-poly wire frame sculptural artwork installation in the form of 4 simplified figures of approximate dimensions 3.2 m (H) x 3m (W) x 2m (D) in total fixed 0.4 m above the roof of the existing link bridge which connects the 2 buildings over Copper Alley along with laser cut decorative anodized bronze metalwork screens fixed to and covering the entirety of both sides of the link bridge.
3036/21
Permission for change of use of the ground floor (c. 155 sqm) to use class 8, for dental surgery.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,058 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3633/21The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief