Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage12 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
12 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 6,133 decisions within 5 km, 12 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 695 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
12 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
12 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
695 structured nearby appeal records.
695 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
The development will consist of a new three bedroom detached two storey house to the side, new vehicular access and all associated site works.
Retention for elevational changes to the house previously granted under planning reference 3636/19 including, change of external wall finish, removal of chimney, additional rooflights and modification of rear bedroom window, and permission for condition 7 of planning reference 3636/19 to be removed. and all associated site works.
RETENTION: Retention permission for development consists of relocation of the front entrance door from the side to the front of the house, addition of a canopy and all associated site works
RETENTION and PERMISSION: The development consists of minor modifications to front elevation and part removal of existing fence creating a new vehicular access and off-street parking.
Planning Permission is sought by Lyndsey O Connell & John Devine for the following works: (i) construction of a single storey extension to the rear of existing dwelling with flat roofs & rooflights (ii) Construction of a single storey extension with flat roof to the front of existing dwelling (iii) Construction of a two storey extension to the side of existing dwelling with pitched roof (iv) Alterations to driveway & widening of existing vehicular entrance onto McAuley Drive and all associated site & drainage works necessary to facilitate the development
Permission sought for a single storey extension and all associated site works to the rear of the existing dwelling.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 6,133 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3636/19The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief