Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage26 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
26 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
20, Windsor Terrace, Portobello, Dublin 8, D08 N8F5
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 14,087 decisions within 5 km, 26 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2852 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 3943/22
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage2852 structured nearby appeal records.
2,852 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched14,087Nearby applications
26Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
2,852Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity7
Visual Amenity4
Design2
Other2
Procedure Invalid2
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
3943/22
Development will consist of A) the demolition of the existing two storey return to the rear of the existing dwelling and B) the construction of a new part single storey, part two storey flat roof extension to the rear of the existing dwelling including all associated site works and services.
2210/21
Planning permission for construction of a part single storey and part two storey extension to the rear of the existing dwelling along with new single storey storage shed, new windows and all other ancillary site development works.
4278/19
Permission for the erection of a single storey garage and storage shed (c. 41m.sq.) to the rear of the existing dwelling with existing vehicular access from Clanbrassil Street. The proposed shed and garage will be ancillary to the main dwelling at 49 Longwood Avenue, South Circular Road, Dublin 8.
WEB1826/23
The development will consist of a new ground floor extension to rear, demolition of existing ground floor extension, removal of existing roof light, new rooflight, alteration of windows to existing extension, internal modifications and associated site works to an existing two-storey mid-terrace dwelling.
WEB1369/20
Proposed widening of existing vehicular access to create off street parking with electric vehicle charge point in front garden and new electric gates and railing to front boundary
WEB1364/21
I, Fiona Joyce, intend to apply for planning permission for development on this site at 16+17 Portobello Wharf, Windsor Terrace / Clanbrassil Street, Dublin D08 W2T2. The proposed development will consist of the conversion of two penthouse apartments, no.16 is 88.5m2 and no.17 is 128.2m2, to use as a single 3No. bedroomed apartment totalling 218.5m2, with associated internal modifications and development works, including the partial demolition of the party wall between the two apartments, the removal of 1no. sliding door from the North Elevation and its replacement with a high level opening window, the blocking up of 1no. entrance door to apartment no.16 and infilling the existing opening with timber cladding to match existing, replacement of 1no. rooflight with a smaller rooflight, the provision of 2no. additional rooflights to the corridor and en-suite and all associated local roof repairs.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 14,087 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 3943/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief