Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage11 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
11 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
2 & 4 Elgin Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,476 decisions within 5 km, 11 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2729 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 4074/24
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage2729 structured nearby appeal records.
2,729 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,476Nearby applications
11Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
2,729Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity8
Visual Amenity6
Design4
Other3
Procedure Invalid3
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
4074/24
PROTECTED STRUCTURE/RETENTION: to retain indefinitely the as constructed parapet upstand detail between properties.
2086/20
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Full Planning Permission for alterations to previously granted Planning Reference No. 3973/18. Proposed alterations consist of change of house type for houses No. 4, 6 & 8, Pembroke Lane, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4, from 3 no. 3 bed units to 3 no. 4 bed units and all associated site works. Within the curtilage of protected structure. All works are associated with site development works to nos. 4, 6, 8 & 10 Elgin Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4 and 4, 6 & 8 Pembroke Lane, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4.
3503/19
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of the creation of two tripartite sash windows to the front elevation serving a bedroom at basement level. The property is a protected structure.
4015/20
Alteration of front facade of house to include removal of existing bay window at first floor level and new double height window and replacement of existing rooflight with dormer window to existing converted attic to front of house.
WEB2259/24
New dormer roof extension with window above existing ridge height to existing converted attic at rear of existing house
3137/24
Single storey extension to the front, single and two storey extension to the rear. Conversion of attic space with a dormer type flat roof to the front and all associated site works to existing dwelling house.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,476 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4074/24The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief