Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage14 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
14 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
5, Richelieu Park, Dublin 4
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 11,722 decisions within 5 km, 14 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2895 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 4153/21
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage2895 structured nearby appeal records.
2,895 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched11,722Nearby applications
14Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
2,895Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity13
Visual Amenity11
Design9
Traffic Sightlines6
Other4
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
4153/21
Altering and extending the rear attic bedroom, by 7 sq.m, by forming a dormer in the rear roof slope of the house and carrying out ancillary contingent works.
4673/22
The proposed development comprises of the construction of a new detached 2 storey with attic, three bedroom dwelling (120 sq.m) to the rear (north-west) of the existing dwelling (Ferns, 16A Sydney Parade Avenue) with one associated roof light. The development will also include amendments to the existing boundary treatments to the front (north-east) and side (south-east) of the subject site and the creation of a new vehicular entrance with 1 no. parking space to serve the proposed dwelling. Associated drainage, landscaping and ancillary works.
3557/24
The development will consist of the construction of a new single storey extension to the rear of existing two storey semi-detached house. Removal of existing rear single storey extension, minor internal alteration to the existing house, landscaping and all associated site works.
3518/23
The development will consist of single storey extension to front of existing dwelling to include modifications to existing elevations and internal plan layout together with all associated site works.
WEB1916/20
Proposed flat roof dormer extension with window to the east side of the main roof, proposed windows to front and rear elevations at attic floor level, proposed roof light to the west side of main roof and associated internal modifications.
2675/20
Permission for the following works at 32 St. John's Road, last used as a dwelling, (a) The removal of a detached outbuilding and demolition of the mid-twentieth century two-storey extension to the rear and sides of the dwelling that incorporates a former parish hall which will be refurbished; (b) modifications to the hall including energy efficiency upgrade and the removal of a c.1960 mezzanine floor; (c) the construction of a new, three-storey, 5 bedroom, residential extension to the east side and partially forward of the original structure, with rooflight and linked to the original structure by a single storey entrance hall, the third storey being a roof level studio with terrace (Total extension 489 sqm); (d) associated landscaping works and an underground rainwater attenuation/recycling tank; the entire to continue in use as a single family dwelling.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 11,722 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4153/21The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief