Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage18 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
18 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 12,660 decisions within 5 km, 18 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1636 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
18 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
18 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
1636 structured nearby appeal records.
1,636 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
PROTECTED STRUCTURE - RPS: 2464: the development will consist of refurbishment of sash windows.
PROTECTED STRUCTURE / RETENTION: The development will consist of works for the retention at ground floor level for medical use and ancillary office/storage and WCs comprising of an area of 100.5 sq.m. No internal or external structural changes or alterations or modifications to rooms, decoration, existing entrance access through shared front door at ground floor level and all other associated site works.
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: Planning permission is sought for construction of a detached single-storey structure and associated works. The proposed building to the rear gardens of no's. 60-63 Eccles Street will extend the capacity of the existing childcare facility which serves the staff of the Mater Hospital and others.
Planning permission is sought for works to include demolition of existing single-storey rear extension and garden shed and construction of new part-single-storey / part-two-storey rear extension, along with associated internal alterations and refurbishments, landscaping and site works.
The development, located to the rear of no 59 Eccles Street (a Protected Structure - NIAH Ref 50070468), and just off St Joseph's Parade, consists of the proposed replacement of the existing corrugated metal sliding vehicular gates with a pair of metal gates with timber infill. The proposal also includes the reopening of the original pedestrian gate (currently blocked up) and the installation of a new single metal gate with timber infill, metal cladding to the non-original concrete head above the gates and ancillary site works.
PERMISSION demolition of an existing 9sqm extension to rear and construction of a 15sqm single storey flat roofed extension to rear with rooflight; a dormer window to rear, and one rooflight to front.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 12,660 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4166/23The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief