Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 11,154 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3006 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
3006 structured nearby appeal records.
3,006 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Conversion of their attic to storage, including a circular window to the front and a partial hipped and partial flat roofed rear dormer structure to the rear all at roof level.
Permission consisting of the following principal elements: 1. demolition of existing single storey lean-to-kitchen and garage structures; 2. construction of a new single storey extension to the north of the existing house, 3. internal alterations and refurbishment works to existing house, 4. raising the level of the existing boundary wall and entrance piers on Strand Road, 5. Widening existing vehicular entrance to the south, 6. the development will include all associated landscaping drainage and site development works.
RETENTION of the clear glazing installed in two windows at first floor on the southern elevation of the house.
The development will consist i) construction of a first floor level atop existing single storey terraced dwelling to match the roof ridge height of the adjoining properties within the Ailesbury Mews terrace; ii) provision of 2 no. rooflights, iii) provision of new dormer window to front (western) elevation at first floor level; iv) provision of new opaquely glazed window to rear (eastern) elevation at first floor level; v) removal/replacement of window treatment to front (western) elevation at ground floor level; and, vi) all ancillary works necessary to facilitate the proposed development.
The development will consist of matching the roof ridge level to that of their terraced neighbours, the addition of a floor in the return to the rear of the single storey house, along with a dormer extension on the roof to the front of the property
Construction of 1) a first floor extension (36 sq.M), a dining area, with blinkered balcony and spiral staircase access to garden level, pop out seat window to side towards sea and glazed rooflight to side roof, and 2) a garden room structure (24 sq.M) to rear.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 11,154 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4245/19The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief