Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage76 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
76 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
22-23 Suffolk Street, Dublin 2 , D02FR96
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
13% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 13,198 decisions within 5 km, 76 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 2062 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 4306/24
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage2062 structured nearby appeal records.
2,062 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched13,198Nearby applications
76Site-linked candidates
13%Nearby refused
2,062Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity3
Design1
Procedure Invalid1
Traffic Sightlines1
Visual Amenity1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
4306/24
PROTECTED STRUCTURE. Permission for proposed internal alterations to allow the removal of partitions, joinery, secondary ceilings, floor finishes and building services all installed in c. 2009 as part of a previous change of use, at the first, second & third floors.
4819/23
PERMISSION: For change of use from office to Dental practice with minor internal alterations at first floor level unit 4 and all associated site works.
WEB1650/25
• Change of use to the existing first to fourth floors from office to licensed restaurant use. • First floor extension (58m²) to provide an enclosed outdoor restaurant area with retractable roof, to the rear of the building. • Front door upgrade with signage associated with restaurant use. • Replace the existing external fire escape stairs to the rear of the building with new steel fire escape stairs. • Reconfigure and refurbishment to the building's interior. • All ancillary site and development works.
WEB1187/26
Dublin City Council-Permission is sought by Pextell Limited for a development at 9/10 Suffolk Street, Dublin 2. The development will consist of a change of use of the ground floor and basement (309.1 sq.m in extent) from its current use as retail to a retail service use for medical screening. The area is currently in use as retail as part of the Superdry retail outlet spanning 6 to 10 Suffolk Street. The retail use will remain in 6 to 8 Suffolk Street. Permission is also sought for new identification entrance signage in existing shop front and to construct a new dividing wall between the two premises at 8 and 9 Suffolk Street.
2958/21
The development will consist of the removal of an existing roller shutter at the entrance to the upper office floor levels, its replacement with decorative metal gates, and raised metal lettering signage above this entrance.
3962/23
PERMISSION: To carry out external works for the removal of an ATM, to be replaced with shop front glazing to match existing, as well as the removal of the Ulster Bank raised lettering shop signs on Grafton Street and Suffolk Street and general blue signage. Carry out internal works for the removal of the ATM, as well as the removal of loose furniture and the removal of Ulster Bank signage and merchandise on all floors.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 13,198 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4306/24The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief