Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage3 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
3 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
Unit 23/24, Tolka Valley Business Park, Dublin 11, D11 Y362
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 8,199 decisions within 5 km, 3 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 944 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 4338/23
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage944 structured nearby appeal records.
944 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched8,199Nearby applications
3Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
944Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity14
Traffic Sightlines10
Visual Amenity7
Other6
Zoning Contravention5
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
4338/23
The development will consist of: (1) change of use from industrial use to a place of worship, (2) internal alterations to include of the removal of the existing internal walls and mezzanine floor and the provision of a new layout with new internal walls and a new floor at first floor level, (3) external alterations to the front and side elevations to include alterations to the existing windows and doors and the provision of new windows and doors, (4) external alterations to the roof to include the removal of the existing rooflights and the provision of new rooflights, (5) alteration of the existing external storage space to the side elevation including the removal of the existing handrail and partial removal of the existing roof and walls.
3728/22
RETENTION: The development consists of the retention of a 40 Foot Refrigeration unit to the rear of the property (12,192mm Long x 2,400mm Wide x2,900mm High).
WEB1638/23
The retention of the existing scrolling internally illuminated double sided ‘Metropole’ advertising display case mounted on an offset leg.
3195/22
Permission to amend previous planning for Rose Cottage Playschool, Hillside, Old Finglas Road, Dublin 11. 1. Amend planning to accommodate 40 children from 12 children. 2. Amend planning of 1st floor from residential to commercial 3. Amend operational times from 9.30am -12.30am to 9am-2.30pm.
2292/21
Planning permission for revisions to approved waste transfer and recovery facility granted 14/09/2017 under plan no 3478/17 to provide for 1. extended site area of 0.64 ha.; 2. relocation of weighbridge and reception office of 12m2 on extended area together with new workshop of 247 sqm2 and 4.2m high screen wall; 3. relocation and widening of existing vehicular entrance to extended area; 4. minor modifications to fenestration of existing factory building; 5. all ancillary site works including new internal roadway.
WEB1384/20
RETENTION: Retain rear single storey extension.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 8,199 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4338/23The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief