Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage19 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
19 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
32 Palmerston Gardens, Rathmines, Dublin 6, D06 X5A0
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
12% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 14,799 decisions within 5 km, 19 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 3553 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 4392/23
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage3553 structured nearby appeal records.
3,553 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched14,799Nearby applications
19Site-linked candidates
12%Nearby refused
3,553Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity10
Visual Amenity7
Design5
Traffic Sightlines5
Density3
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
4392/23
Development will consist of a new vehicular entrance to the front of the existing site and all ancillary works.
5026/22
The development will consist of the construction of (i) a single storey flat roof ground floor porch extension with rooflight to the side; (ii) a single storey pitched roof bay window extension to the front; (iii) 2 no. Velux windows, one on each side of the main roof; (iv) internal modifications; (v) external insulation with smooth render finish to all existing external walls; (vi) alterations to all elevations & all ancillary works to facilitate the development.
5049/23
The development will consist of: A 2-storey extension to front, first floor extension side and single storey extension to rear of existing 2 storey detached mews dwelling. Elevational alterations, internal modifications, and all associated site development works.
WEB1211/21
The development will consist of construction of new two storey extension ( area: 26.5 square meters ) onto Southern side of existing dwelling, incorporating pedestrian entrance on new Southern Elevation and associated site works.
4069/23
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: PERMISSION:Consisting of the construction of an external stairs with landing to the rear of house leading from the return level landing of the existing internal stairs to the outside garden level. The proposal includes extending the bottom level of the existing rear window opening downwards, at the stairwell landing of the existing house, to create a doorway accessing the external stairs. The stairs is proposed as a painted steel structure, to match the original Victorian ironwork of the house. The existing brickwork detail to the rear window surround will be retained. The house is a Protected Structure.
3551/21
PROTECTED STRUCTURE: The development will consist of the demolition of the existing 30.1 sqm garage structure to the rear and replacement with a new 48.8 sqm Garden Room structure and 7.1 sqm Garden Shed, both to the rear. Works to front of the dwelling include the construction of a new bin store and service meter box enclosure, along with the widening of the existing front gate from 2.45m to 3.2m; including associated site and drainage works, all at No. 5 Temple Villas (Protected Structure), a part 1-storey/part 2-storey/part 3-storey semi-detached dwelling.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 14,799 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4392/23The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief