Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage12 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
12 matchedFree preview / €39 incl. VAT site brief
See sample PDFSite planning risk brief
Fix the brief to an Eircode, a dropped pin or a drawn site boundary. PlanIntel then checks the planning register, available spatial layers, appeals and current indexed policy evidence.Site locator
Define the land to check
The report your architect will ask for — here is how it compares with a €49 pre-planning report.
| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
€39 incl. VAT once-off PDF, no account required
Refund requests are reviewed under the published refund policy
Derived from public planning records and linked source documents
PlanIntelSite risk brief preview
Site planning risk brief
No. 9 Copeland Place, Howth Road, Clontarf, Dublin 3, D03 W9F5
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Preview
Executive snapshot
Local planning pattern
11% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 11,004 decisions within 5 km, 12 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 1364 structured appeals.
- Matched source
- 4393/24
- Project type
- One-off house
- Coverage
- 5 km radius
Evidence maturity
What this site brief can substantiate today
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
Zoning and settlement
Partial coverage1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedRural-housing policy
Not yet coveredNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
Flood, heritage, ecology and archaeology
Partial coverage2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matchedAccess, road and wastewater prompts
Partial coverage0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
Structured appeal history
Confirmed coverage1364 structured nearby appeal records.
1,364 matchedCurrent policy citations
Confirmed coverageCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matched11,004Nearby applications
12Site-linked candidates
11%Nearby refused
1,364Structured appeals
Open preview
Top refusal reasons nearby
Residential Amenity1
Visual Amenity1
Wastewater Percolation1
Zoning Contravention1
Open preview
Nearest planning decisions
4393/24
PERMISSION: The development will consist of the installation of a new inward opening pedestrian entrance gate and access to the rear boundary and lane with associated site works and landscaping.
3610/20
RETENTION: Retention permission sought for alterations to previously approved development under Reg. Ref 4074/16 and Reg.Ref 3281/18. Alterations to rear dwellings, units 4,5, 6 and 7only. These alterations consist of; (a) Changes to the front elevation of units 4,5,6, and 7 which include (i) First floor portion of timber fins with glazing behind removed and replaced with brick wall (ii) Second Floor, replacement of brick screen to windows with timber screening. (b) Changes to the rear elevation of units 4, 5, 6, and 7. (i) Reduction of fenestration size to ground, first, and second floor. (ii) Removal of brick screening to second floor terrace. (c) Reduction of the floor plate to unit 4 on ground, first and second floor. (d) Minor alterations to second floor layout of units 4, 5, 6, and 7 to include. (i) Reconfiguration of WC layout to Bedroom 03 (ii) An additional WC to Bedroom 04, no increase in building footprint or bedroom numbers is being proposed. (e) Reduction of roof lights to units 4, 5, 6, and 7. (f) The reduction of the front boundary wall height to unit 4 from 1800mm to 1300mm
2225/20
RETENTION: These alterations consist of (a) changes to the front and rear elevations of units 1, 2 and 3, which include (i) changes to fenestration sizes and (ii) reduction of perforated brick sections. (b) Minor alterations to the second floor of units 1 and 2 which include (i) reconfiguration of wc layout and second floor void over hallway. No increase in bedroom numbers or building footprint is being proposed. (iii) the addition of a railing to the front boundary wall and associated site works and landscaping/ancillary works necessary to facilitate amendments to the development.
WEB1440/19
Construction of a rear attic dormer to existing attic conversion and associated works
WEB1599/24
The development will consist of a new single-storey flat roof 11sqm rear extension with rooflight and the relocation of the front driveway pier to widen the existing vehicular entrance and all associated site works.
3915/19
Permission sought for removal of existing boundary wall, gates and shed fronting Charlemont Lane and the construction of 4 no. two storey dwellings.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 11,004 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4393/24The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Exact site history and boundary checks
Site brief
Included in site brief
Policy and mapped constraints
Site brief
Included in site brief
Appeals and comparable decisions
Site brief
Included in site brief
Deterministic risk prompts
Site brief