Applications tied to the site
Partial coverage16 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
16 matched| PlanIntel brief | PlanningCheck | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | €39 incl. VAT | €49 |
| Nearby decisions | Up to 80 detailed (40 refusals + 40 grants) | Not stated |
| AI planning chat | 5 messages/day free | None |
| Saved-site alerts | Free | None |
Site planning risk brief
One-off house / within 5 km where a location match is available
Executive snapshot
9% of nearby decided applications were refused. The site check found 6,759 decisions within 5 km, 16 exact-site or onsite candidate records, and 805 structured appeals.
Evidence maturity
Each section reports its own coverage, per county. “Not yet covered” means the source dataset is not loaded for this local authority, so the brief draws no conclusion there and says where to check — it never reads as “no constraint found”.
16 register records are within the point-match tolerance; a parcel boundary is needed to treat this as exact.
16 matched1 of 2 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; settlement boundary is not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for it.
1 matchedNo verified rural-housing citation is loaded for Dublin City Council, so this brief makes no current policy claim and relies on decision history.
2 of 4 layers are loaded for Dublin City Council and were intersected with the site; flood and built heritage are not loaded and no conclusion is drawn for them.
2 matched0 prompts are backed by extracted nearby decision evidence; all prompts remain checks, not predictions.
805 structured nearby appeal records.
805 matchedCitations are current-dated and carry policy name, section, page and source URL from the Dublin City Council development plan.
1 matchedOpen preview
Open preview
Planning permission for alterations to previously approved plans (Reg Ref 4473/22) to now include for increased area and altered layouts to single storey and part two storey extensions to the rear. The increase in area is from 77 sq m to 100 sq. m. on the ground floor and from 4.5 to 12 sq m on the first floor. No alterations to previously approved plans are proposed at the front of the house.
Planning permission for the demolition of the existing utility room and part of the existing study to the rear and construction of a new single storey and part two storey extension comprising enlarged kitchen, new dining / family room and new bathrooms, alterations to front elevation to include front porch extension, internal alterations and retention permission for widening of the vehicular access.
Planning permission is sought by Niall & Sharon Gaffney for the following works: (i) installation of a new flat roof dormer window to the front of existing pitched roof (ii) installation of new flat roof dormer window to the rear of existing pitched roof and all associated works necessary to facilitate the development all at 301 Clontarf Road, Clontarf, Dublin 3.
Proposed (A) Single-storey garden room extension to rere (B) Garage conversion to side (C) the insertion of a high level top opening sash in obscure glazing to an existing obscure-glazed, fixed pane window, to west side, at first floor level & (D) Garden shed to rere; all at 299, Clontarf Rd, Dublin 3, for Tina & Karl Walsh
The development will consist of the construction of a new single storey extension to rear of existing dwelling, including associated landscaping and drainage. Works will include the provision of a new dormer window to the rear of the existing pitched roof.
RETENTION The development consists of a garden shed [12.3 m2] to the rear of the dwelling and a bicycle shed [3.3 m2] to the front of the dwelling.
The brief summarizes the pattern across all 6,759 matched decisions within 5 km and includes up to 80 detailed comparables (40 nearest refusals and 40 nearest grants), with extracted reasons, quotes, and available source links. €39 incl. VAT.
Source match
Matched from public planning record 4473/22The site brief adds up to 80 nearest detailed grants and refusals, extracted source evidence, document links, and a shareable risk summary.
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief
Included in site brief